Hello all,
First off, this absolutely builds on the shoulders of giants. I developed this idea from one I suggested to @Jen in this question/topic:
And in fact that built on something suggested by @Alex O_Donnell in the same place.
Now, this method means you have one term per page. I had forgotten about page name collisions. The glossary I'm managing does not have its own workspace.
Alex's brainstorm
"
Jen's question
"...I don't know how to separate the page index to a specific alphabetical group. We'd love to use this concept on other Spaces to create a Rolodex in the page menu."
My suggestion
"Could you not use multiple labels, à la :
glossary-a_to_i
glossary-j_to_o
glossary-p_to_z
...so each term-specific page would us one of those three, as appropriate?"
(You would have three Content By Label macros on the index page in this example, by the way).
The light-bulb moment
The glossary I created for the project I'm working on has always been a one-pager. I had put in large single letters in a seriously cursive font, as delineators. Rendered:
I thought: I want to put better letter-heading graphics on the glossary index page. How to have them there in the first place, though?
So:
Why "glossary" as a second label? I wanted to have a LiveSearch macro on the glossary index page, as well. It picks up the "glossary" label.
I created the letter-heading graphics I wanted to use, and here's part of how the rendered glossary index page looks:
Unrendered, here's one letter heading graphic and Content By Label macro, the latter not opened for editing:
And here's the macro, opened for editing:
And that's really the whole recipe. If anyone's not 100% clear on how this works, please reply here, and I'll do my best.
Best,
Pat O'Connell
Technical Writer
MindGeek / Montreal
Patrick O_Connell
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
3 comments