Just a heads up: On March 24, 2025, starting at 4:30pm CDT / 21:30 UTC, the site will be undergoing scheduled maintenance for a few hours. During this time, the site might be unavailable for a short while. Thanks for your patience.
×Hi all,
Is it possible to completely hide Confluence table borders without tinkering with CSS styles?
Setting "border" to "0" gives in 1px gray borders around table cells (Confluence 3.5):
{table:border=0|cellpadding=0|cellspaceing=0|frame=void|rules=none}
|| header1 || header 2 ||
| cell11 | cell 12 |
| cell 21 | cell 22 |
{table}
Hi Pavel,
you have to do it like this:
{table:border=0|cellpadding=0|cellspaceing=0|frame=void|rules=none} {tr} {th}header1{th} {th}header 2{th} {tr} {tr} {td}cell11 {td} {td}cell 12 {td} {tr} {tr} {td}cell 21 {td} {td}cell 22 {td} {tr} {table}
Thanks for your answer!
I'm bit confused by Confluence table syntax, because by default Confluence editor generates a table with cells separated by pipe "|" symbol. I somehow expected that iternally the same rendering code used for both syntax variants - pipe "|" and {tr}{td}.
Do you have any idea why tables were impletented this way? Is {tr}{td} more preferable / recent syntax than "|"?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Pavel,
the regular Wiki-Syntax for tables is the one with pipes.
But if you use the {table} makro from adaptavist, you have to use also the {tr}, {th} and {td} macros inside.
You cannot use the pipe-Syntax within the {table}-Makro. Then you get a regular Confluence-Table with borders.
Best regards
Thomas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In confluence 4.3.6 it seems one can't edit the markup anymore. Is there anyway of getting rid of a table border once created?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Table Plugin for Confluence will do what you want:
{table-plus:border=0|class=''} || header1 || header 2 || | cell11 | cell 12 | | cell 21 | cell 22 | {table-plus}
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So what you're saying is that Atlassian has essentially allowed for zero-border tables to be locked down behind your paid add-on that is not available for my several-thousand-user Cloud instance?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So it's been 8 years since the original question: just wanted to check whether the Confluence product has improved tables since then, and now allows this basic thing - or has there been no improvement what-so-ever?
Thanks,
Richard.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi all,
I would actually like to tie my post to what @Eric Rodewald asked back in 2018. Is there any solution for the cloud version because source coding it not allowed there.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Richard Morris I'm a new client and I'm using the most up-to-date version of Cloud Confluence and the table in Editor does not *appear* to have a hide gridlines feature.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Really disappointed in this. I hid table borders in Confluence server, and now trying to do it in Cloud. I'm amazed there aren't more options for table properties in Confluence Cloud. Don't get me started on not being able to put a border around an image anymore!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
They could at least add white to the table border colors!?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
But that would allow you to put a workaround in place, and then they wouldn't get those sweet sweet marketplace dollars!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.