IMO, the above seems fine. However, the ask from my team is to have separate steps for testing between the environments they typically test in. Perhaps something like, In Review >> Resolved (if peers approve) >> In QA Review (Dev) >> In QA Review (QA).
There are times when QA can test in dev but then are blocked from continuing their testing in QA due to some issue on that environment.
We'd like to add a new status to the BRUC and QM projects.
The 'Dev Testing' status would come after Ready For Testing/In QA and precede QA Testing.
JIRA supports that.
I think you might have posted this in the wrong place. It looks like a change request for your administrators, but this is a public forum for end-users - we have no admin rights over your system (unless one of your admins is here). If my guess is correct, then could you talk to your admins? If I am wrong and you are looking for community support, then could you explain where you are stuck?
Join us June 26, 11am PT for a webinar with Atlassian Champion Robert Hean & Loom’s Brittany Soinski. Hear tips, stories, and get your burning questions answered. Learn how Loom makes training and enablement easier. Don’t miss it!
Register todayOnline forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.