How do I configure a workflow such that:
An issue in PROJECT-A has a status of DONE
The issue needs to be moved to PROJECT-B
On moving it to PROJECT-B it picks up a status of NEW
I am testing this on a jira instance that has two projects, A and B. A is scrum, B is Kanban. I have no custom workflows in either project.
The option to set a new status when using the "MOVE" option on the issue tells me that "Step 2 is not required"
This is the step where I believe I should be able to set a new status.
Is this because "Done" is a special status in Jira or do I need to make some customizations to allow me to achieve this?
Ok thanks for that Nic. So the trick here is to ensure that there is no overlap in the names of the statuses between the two projects forcing Jira to ask me which of the statuses I want it to land in when it arrives in the second project.
I don't know if you had the opportunity to read my second post explaining the situation in a bit more detail before you replied but the situation here is pretty much "Project A is borked from a setup and config point of view, we need to move to project B however there is a lot that remains to be done in project A and much of that work is being done by a third party"
This is absolutely a rescue operation. Project B needs to be owned and managed by the company I am with, and account for all the internal processes and integrations. Project A is largely under the control of the supplier.
Nope, didn't see the follow-up before I wrote the last answer. Repairing a mess is a good reason to move things though, with the eventual aim of shutting down A.
I think having slightly different workflows is the only real answer here.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>The issue needs to be moved to PROJECT-B
This is usually a broken process in Jira terms. Issues should generally not move between projects. When they do, it should be because you're doing things like closing an old project but keeping some stuff open, or because a mistake was made and the issue went into the wrong project when created.
Moving an issue is hard work. You have to do all of the work around checking the config between source and target is valid, then move it, feeding it with any missing or changed information.
When you use the UI to do this, it simplifies it as much as possible, and only asks you about things that are necessary. If you have the current status in the target project, it won't ask you about it because it assumes you need the same.
So, two points here.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok I have read that. The situation I am in, as so many others probably are, is that the company I am working with bought Jira and simply tipped all their requirements into it with absolutely no planning or thought as to workflow or process.
They then agreed to a delivery process with a third party that allowed that third party to move a story to "done" once the back end data object was built. No User interface, no integration with the master data, literally nothing, just a database table.
I now need to come up with a way of managing stories so that "done" means "done" This means that the content management team have done their work, the web developers have done their work, the MDM and enterprise service bus teams have done their work and stories move between these teams across boards in a new, well organised project.
The other thread is OK, in as much as it tells me that the project and process has been set up wrong, or more accurately not set up at all. I know this.
My question is "how do I recover this situation with this toolset" ?
My view is that I move issues between projects and reset the status to "new" on the move. Can Jira support this without extensive coding or am I just S*** Out Of Luck.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.