In Confluence, I've been making use of the Jira Issue/Filter macro.
In a project summary page, I've created a filter that is displaying Updated and Resolved information.
It looks like Updated is a DateTime, and Resolved is a Date.
The trick I'm getting for an issue that I have just resolved is that it is displaying the following values:
Screen snippet below:
I'm guessing that this is a timezone related issue. I am based in New Zealand, which is currently in NZDT (+13:00) - so my assumption is that this is being stored as a Date value using a system-level timezone instead. This would explain why, relative to my timezone, it looks as if the Resolved date is coming through as yesterday's date.
I'm trying to use this particular filter to communicate the project status to a client, and they've requested resolution dates be included. But this is misleading.
I can always just drop the 'Resolved' date from the list and use the 'Updated' date to represent the resolution. That's not 100% accurate as the 'Updated' date may change after the time the issue is resolved, but in practice that will be rare so it's probably okay in practice even if it's wrong in principle.
But that still kind of bugs me. In principle I would prefer this to work so that the resolution date shows the date in my local timezone that the issue was resolved.
So, questions:
Thanks for your time!
Hi, we are seeing the same issue, found the below after some searching -
https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFSERVER-42863
Ticket for cloud -
https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFCLOUD-42863
Thanks
Thanks! I'll check them out.
For a bit of context for yourself and others that may be reading: I wound up using a manually maintained table for communicating that information to the client.
Frustrating because it's more work prior to each meeting to manually update the project page from something that could in principle have been covered automatically, but not the end of the world.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
2. Is this a known issue in Jira?
This is not an issue in JIRA. This is by JIRA design.
3. Is there likely to be a 'fix' for this?
N/A, since this is not an issue
4. Is there a workaround or a setting I can change in the meantime to get this to work the way I want it to work?
JIRA's datetime fields either show relative values or absolute values and this JIRA setting is global for a JIRA instance.
Please refer the below Atlassian doc for more details on how to set up JIRA to show the absolute dates for datetime fields:
https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/disable-relative-dates-in-jira-applications-414187622.html
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Taranjeet.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the documentation you've given me seems to be for Jira Server.
I'm running Jira and Confluence in the cloud.
Additionally, I am using the Confluence "Jira Issue/Filter" macro to display these results. It seems to be the display of the results that is confusing matters.
Is there a method I can use in that macro that will display the Resolved values in the same manner as the Updated values are displayed when using the "Jira Issue/Filter" macro in Confluence?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Daniel Schealler If you are using JIRA and Confluence Cloud, please reach out to Atlassian Support for your issues/queries or any settings that you want to apply to your JIRA/Confluence instance.
Additionally, try to use fields like "resolutionDate" instead of "Resolved" to see what results are returned by it?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Daniel Schealler Alos this behavior for datetime fields display in JIRA issues macro, is an existing Confluence bug, that has not been resolved yet. Please see this on Atlassian Bug tracker here:
https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFSERVER-26381
There is also a workaround listed there if it help you, but be aware that the change will impact all datetime fields and their display in Confluence.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks again Taranjeet.
"please reach out to Atlassian Support for your issues/queries or any settings that you want to apply to your JIRA/Confluence instance."
I was checking in with the community first to see if there is a known issue that I can reference before contacting Atlassian Support.
I'll likely be contacting them shortly if the community isn't familiar with this issue.
Additionally, try to use fields like "resolutionDate" instead of "Resolved" to see what results are returned by it?
There is no 'resolutionDate' option in the macro. Screen snippet below.
Alos this behavior for datetime fields display in JIRA issues macro, is an existing Confluence bug, that has not been resolved yet. Please see this on Atlassian Bug tracker here:
That listed issue link states that the problem is around displaying the time on custom fields.
However, based on documentation you already gave me, it looks like the Resolved field is not a custom field, but is a core part of Jira. Are you sure that this applies here?
Also: That issue is stating that custom date time fields are not displaying the time portion. I think I misspoke earlier: I don't mind either way if the time is present or not, that doesn't matter for my particular use case.
My problem is that an issue that was resolved on January 15th (local time, NZDT) is being reported in the Confluence macro as having a resolved date of January 14th (timezone unverified). The value is _wrong_ in the sense of what is being reported back to the client.
It sounds like this is not a known issue for the community at this time.
I'll leave this question open for a while to see what else comes in. If nothing else comes through, I'll raise it with Atlassian support and see what comes up.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.