The rationale has been addressed previously in https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/STASH-4385, but essentially the rationale is that Stash uses Markdown to be consistent with other software development tools.
Mike,
JIRA does not use Markdown. It uses it's own Wiki Markup: https://jira.atlassian.com/secure/WikiRendererHelpAction.jspa?section=all
-- Pedro
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok so it's not called Markdown, but that doesn't take away from the fact that there are two separate interfaces to accomplish relatively the same thing. Why would Atlassian choose to handle things differently between the applications? I'm most interested in the philosophy behind that decision.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
JIRA uses a suspect of what confluence used to use. Stash was written later when a different markup language was more popular
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Subset not suspect
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.