Hi,
Is it possible to use a self-hosted runner for Bitbucket Pipelines and in case the self hosted runner is down or unavailable, the jobs can fallback to the standard Atlassian Bitbucket runners for execution.
Hello @Vivek Chauhan !
Thank you for reaching out to Community!
Currently, if Bitbucket pipelines are not able to communicate with the self-hosted runner, the pipeline step will fail and there isn't currently a failover mechanism to run that same pipeline in Bitbucket's cloud runners. For that, you would need to manually update the YML file to remove the runs-on option in the step.
We do have a feature request to implement the functionality of failover, which you can access with the following link :
I strongly recommend adding your Vote to that feature so our product managers can better understand the interest. You can also add yourself as a Watcher to be notified whenever there's any update on that feature.
Thank you, @Vivek Chauhan !
Patrik S
Thanks for your response @Patrik S , I have voted for the same and hope it gets picked up in future for implementation.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.