I have one project & board, with multiple tickets in the backlog. We are not going to work on these tickets until late 2017. I don't want to delete them, since we'll need them in the future, but I also don't want to clutter my backlog with work that we don't need to discuss (or accidentally pull into a Sprint!).
The only possible action that I can think of to "hide" these in the backlog view, without deleting them, is to do a bulk move to a new project that I could call "Archived Project." Is there an easier solution to hide/archive within the current project that I could restore in the future?
Another project is one way to do it.
The other two options that spring to mind without coding are:
You could combine those ideas too, although it's a bit of a faff - have a security level that uses the custom field flag to hide things (then you don't need to alter filters)
Another way to achieve this is configure issue security level to Archived. And set issue security level for issues to Archive issues.
Then you set users with issue security level "Archived" only to access these issues. Once your time has come to re-leave it to public, then you can remove security level of these issues and it will e open for everyone. When you start working on issue securities you'll e most happiest person.
You'll enjoy
Rangs
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In other words, what the answer already said.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If you want to use it with JIRA Software with Kanban (or kanplan), i like to use released version "Archive", because all issues with released versions are by default filtered out (by board sub-filter).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Total agree, option Archive it's very useful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You could create a status of 'On Hold' and move them to that status. When you configure the board don't show that status in any of the columns.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
To create a new status, would I need to add it to the workflow? I suppose I could add it on the workflow, but not necessarily have anything move to or from it. I worry, though, that my users would "accidentally" move needed tickets to that status. I'll play around with it. Thanks!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If you're using a Next-gen project, this is how I solved it:
You can click on the ellipses of the "Done" column and it will give the option to "Clear X Done Issues". By clearing them, it removes them visually from the board without deleting them. You can still find them by searching for "Done" issues in the Backlog.
In addition, if you're using a Roadmap with your project, you can filter your Roadmap so it hides the "Done issues".
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
My issue is that we've been using Jira for some 7 years, and there's a ton of crap from the long-long-ago that I'd like to get out of the system to help clean up reporting and query return times. I don't want to just hide issues from view, I want to get rid of them - but I want to keep them in case we need to audit something down the road.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
John, have you considered archiving those issues to PDF and store them elsewhere, or preferably in a doc. management system long term for audit requests? Jira issue archiving this way worked for a government organization that had a similar use case.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, I hadn't thought of that. That's a good idea, thank you.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @JenD
Wanted to share that we just released issue-level archiving (archive individual issues, bulk edit through JQL search, or automated through APIs) in Jira Software Data Center 8.4. Here's our announcement and blog with all the details:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
pretty disappointing that such a basic feature as archiving is available only for data center clients who, if I'm not mistaken, pay a minimum of 10k per year
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We use labels and filters (avoiding adding a status to your workflow), to do this.
1. Use JQL to find the issues you want to achieve (in our case anything not touched in the last 3 months)
2. Bulk add a label
3. Update the backlog filter for your project to ignore issues with this label
We've written up a longer post that goes through the process step by step. Hope it helps!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Depending what you mean by "need them in future" maybe archiving them using this tool would be sufficient for you? https://gitlab.com/kaszaq/jiratomkdocs/
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.