Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MR Requests \ Initial Code Review

Neil Wills
Contributor
January 31, 2023

 

During spring planning we are planning story based upon our teams velocity over time, to avoid over committing we are also noticing that Merge Request take a significant amount of time during a sprint to go through the initial review, and then the final reviews or senior reviews.

The team was to commit up front during planning for each story who will be the initial team member assigned to commit to the initial merge request.

In this way during Sprint planning we can see the story points we are committing to, as well as a team we can review who is assigned to complete the initial merge request.

This is a team where we are also using the 1st review as a way to pass on knowledge to those who want to learn the frontend or backend, or learn the code review practice at the organization.

 

There is a custom field that we use, but as you imagine that requires being up a query to see who we have assigned reviewers to during the sprint planning view.

 

Has anyone experimented with something like this to ensure that the team does not overcommit with Story points and the time that we spend on code reviews with a team that is growing in knowledge on the platform.

0 answers

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
PREMIUM
TAGS
atlassian, loom, loom for training, loom for teaching, video training, async learning, online education, screen recording, loom tutorials, loom use cases, atlassian learning, team training tools, instructional video, virtual training tools

🛗 Elevate Your Training and Enablement with Loom

Join us June 26, 11am PT for a webinar with Atlassian Champion Robert Hean & Loom’s Brittany Soinski. Hear tips, stories, and get your burning questions answered. Learn how Loom makes training and enablement easier. Don’t miss it!

Register today
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events